Testing (a/b Or Usability Testing)

1

How to start working with us.

Geolance is a marketplace for remote freelancers who are looking for freelance work from clients around the world.

2

Create an account.

Simply sign up on our website and get started finding the perfect project or posting your own request!

3

Fill in the forms with information about you.

Let us know what type of professional you're looking for, your budget, deadline, and any other requirements you may have!

4

Choose a professional or post your own request.

Browse through our online directory of professionals and find someone who matches your needs perfectly, or post your own request if you don't see anything that fits!

Large-scale usability testing can take months. This is a significant investment in time, money, and effort. Many usability testing organizations require specific figures. Forrester's recent report lists some straightforward metrics that show that usability training is good and surprisingly expensive. There should be ways to show usability testing results, the implementation of our recommended changes, and the desired outcomes concerning these changes. We can correlate changes made in some such indicators with improvements on the website and its user interface, but other factors might also lead to these changes.

Put A/B testing in its place.

A/B testing is also known as split or bucket testing. It's utilized to conduct usability tests of two versions of a web page, commonly referred to as A & B, against each other to determine which version performs better (or worse). The metric you're trying to improve determines the page you're going to the A/B test. For example, you might A/B test the signup page to see whether button colour affects your conversion rate. However, you can't split test a single web page because it would be impossible to tell which variation was better without some other common element that all variations share (for example, a logo).

A/B testing is something that online marketers often do to collect user input to improve their websites. A split usability test can be used to determine which of two or more versions of a page:

a) works better in terms of some metric (for instance: e-commerce conversion rates); and

b) is more efficient at enticing the behaviour that we seek from users (e.g., clicking the "add to cart" button); and

c) is suited to a particular group of people (e.g., males or females, people from different age groups and backgrounds, those who live in different areas).

Usability testing is defined as "the process of gathering feedback from a representative of user behaviour about how easy an interface is to use." It is a well-established term in the product design area. It refers to gathering feedback from a representative of user behaviour about how easy it is to use a computer program or website, which would help improve future articles. Usability testing can occur in several ways, but one of the most effective approaches involves conducting moderated remote testing sessions. Moderated remote testing sessions let you gather feedback from representative users about how easy an interface is to use. Such qualitative insights are beneficial in terms of human-computer interaction.

A/B tests and usability testing both have their benefits, disadvantages, and limitations; each method can be suitable on its own but may not necessarily produce better insights than the other. Therefore, it's crucial that after conducting A/B testing on your website, you should also test the results through a usability testing session. This lets you find out whether your target users click, tell a friend about your website or return to use it again after using the new version of the website.

In addition to measuring behaviour using metrics from A/B tests and usability testing, we can improve the user experience as a whole. Conducting A/B tests is one way of understanding your users' needs and requirements. Usability testing helps you know how your target audiences are experiencing the website, right from their first impression to the point where they reach the goal they were looking for when browsing through an e-commerce website. Both kinds of testing have their limitations too. For example, A/B tests are conducted on small samples of users for short durations, whereas usability testing is performed with a more significant number of participants over more extended periods.

You can pick professionals on our platform.

A/B testing is also known as split or bucket testing. It's utilized to test two versions of a web page, commonly referred to as A & B, against each other to determine which version performs better (or worse).

You were tired of wasting money on ads that don't work? Geolance has the solution for you! With our easy-to-use interface and advanced features, we'll help you find out what works best with your audience so you can get more conversions without having to spend more money. We're here to make sure that every dollar counts when it comes down to advertising online. So let us take care of all your ad needs while you focus on growing your business! 

Desire: Wanting a higher conversion rate from your website traffic? Our A/B Testing tool will allow you to test different variations of text and images on your site so that you know precisely what converts the most visitors into customers - saving time and money in the process! 

User Usability Testing Vs A/B Testing: Friends or Foes

It is common knowledge that A/B testing and usability testing are two different things. But the question arises, should you conduct both kinds of tests for your website or focus on one? The simple answer to this question is: it depends! It all depends on what exactly you want to test and how much time you have at your disposal. for example, A/B testing is a more efficient method when the goal is to find out which version of a web page works better in terms of some metric (e.g., e-commerce conversion rates) and also if you have a minimal timeframe to conduct your experiments. On the other hand, usability testing helps you understand how your target audiences are experiencing the website, right from their first impression to the point they reached the goal they were looking for when browsing through an e-commerce website.

The Combined Power of User Testing and A/B Testing – Reasons

1. Rely on A/B testing alone, or do you need to supplement it with user testing?

2. What should you do if A/B testing and user testing results yield conflicting results?

3. Then to use user testing and when to apply A/B testing?

Both these methods have their benefits, disadvantages, and limitations; each process can be good on its own but may not necessarily produce better insights than the other. Therefore, it's essential that after conducting A/B testing on your website, you should also test the results through a usability testing session. This lets you find out whether your users click, tell a friend about your website or return to use it again after using the new version of the website.

A/B testing is a more efficient method when the goal is to find out which version of a web page works better in terms of some metric (e.g., e-commerce conversion rates) and if you have a minimal timeframe to conduct your experiments. Usability testing helps you understand how your target audiences are experiencing the website, right from their first impression to the point at which they reach the goal they were looking for when browsing through an e-commerce website.

Limitations

The main limitation of A/B testing is that it can only tell you about the possible outcomes of your changes but not really why those changes were successful. On the other hand, usability testing focuses on formative feedback and cannot judge which web page version works better.

Why Combine?

Combining A/B testing with user testing is beneficial for two reasons. First, once you can find out whether or not your chances are better than the original version of the web page, you will be able to know how much improvement you have made in terms of the metrics that matter the most to your business goals. Secondly, usability testing helps A/B testers better understand why one set of changes outperforms another set of changes. This information allows them to fine-tune their approach to come up with even more effective variations, ultimately improving results.

Several marketers now use these methods to conduct experiments on their websites and mobile apps. You can either use A/B testing to judge the effectiveness of your changes or run a user testing session without any changes on the website. It would be good to find out which technique works better before beginning your experiments so that you don't waste time and resources in the process of optimization. Whatever method you choose, it's best to combine them as Web Analytics - Testing (A/B Or Usability Testing).

A/B testing and its challenges

A/B testing has its limitations, even though it helps you know which version of the web page works better in terms of some metric. Where are some of the common challenges that you should be aware of before beginning your A/B testing session:

1. Sample size - The sample size required for conducting an A/B test depends on the hypothesis you want to prove and how much improvement you expect from your changes. If your desired result is very marginal (e.g., 1% increase in conversion rates), then even a smaller sample size can be good enough for proving or disproving your hypothesis. However, if the results are significant (e.g., a 20% increase), you will need more test subjects to get a statistically significant impact.

2. ack of traffic - In an A/B testing session, two web page versions are shown simultaneously, which means there should be some traffic on both pages. Suppose you expect your changes to improve the results significantly and your website doesn't get enough organic search engine traffic (e.g., for an e-commerce website). In that case, it can be difficult for you to conduct such tests because they will take too long and might even prove inconclusive in many cases.

3. Effects of seasonality - Even if the traffic to your website is enough, you should keep in mind that A/B testing cannot take into account the effects of seasonality - like if you are testing two versions of your web page during the Christmas season for increasing sales during that period. Many things can affect users' behaviour during that period, and one test will not always produce accurate results.

4. Engaged visitors - The main objective of conducting an A/B test is to find out which version of a web page converts better, so it's necessary to have at least some number of engaged users on both these pages. Otherwise, there won't be any way for you to tell whether or not your changes made any at all. Even if you have enough traffic to conduct an A/B test, if most of them are not engaged or are not visiting your website for the proper purpose, it will be challenging to get accurate results.

5. Multiple tests at once - Another problem with A/B testing is that if you are trying out multiple changes on your website simultaneously, it becomes tough to find out which change caused what change in conversion rates. Or example, let's say two changes are being tested simultaneously on a web page - the image size has been changed to 800 x 600 px, and the call-to-action button colour has been changed to red from blue. If the increase in conversion rate is due only to the change in the image size and not to the red colour of the call-to-action button, it will be difficult for you to determine which difference is responsible for this increase.

User testing (a/b Or Usability Testing) instead

User testing can be a good alternative if A/B testing has limitations like sample size, traffic, etc. It helps you find out how users behave on your website and what changes they expect from your website that can help you improve its conversion rate. Here are some of the benefits of user testing:

1. It can be used in any scenario - Whether you have enough traffic or not, whether your results are significant or not - user testing can be conducted under any circumstance because it provides you qualitative feedback.

2. Better data in less time - User testing can produce better results in much less time than an A/B test because it provides qualitative rather than just quantitative feedback. You will know where exactly your users are facing problems and what improvements they expect on your website that can boost its conversion rates.

3. provides actionable advice - Unlike the output of an A/B test which shows you data related only to changes made on a web page, user testing will show you real insights related to why users behave the way they do on your website and how these insights can help you improve overall user experience, thus increasing conversions.

So, if there is no significant traffic or other factors are limiting your ability to conduct an A/B test, you should always go for user testing. It will provide you with more accurate results within a short period - which can then be used to make website improvements that will increase conversions.

When to choose user testing and when to choose AB testing in the optimization process

The best way to find out when you should choose user testing and when you should go for A/B testing is to understand that both these tools help you find out how your website can be improved but in different ways.

In the case of an A/B test, you need to make changes on one web page and see the impact it has on users' behaviour (conversions). On the other hand, in the case of a user test, you need to get feedback from actual users regarding their experience on your website and use this feedback to improve overall UX, which will lead to increased conversions without any changes being made on the web page. The point that needs to be in mind here is that AB testing tries to fix the problem by making changes on your website, whereas user testing tries to fix the problem by making changes in your organization.

So, suppose you are conducting an A/B test instead of user testing. In that case, it is because you have enough traffic so that even minor changes made on your website can impact conversion rates significantly. On the other hand, if you are conducting a user test instead of an A/B test, there might be other reasons like lack of resources (needing more time or involving more people, etc.) or maybe because not much traffic is available for conducting an A/B test.

No behavioural insights

If you cannot get any meaningful behavioural insights from user testing, then there is a possibility that your sample size might be too small. In such a case, you should conduct an A/B test to determine which change on a web page did better than the other and then use this information to improve conversions.

But if no statistically-significant changes can be found even after conducting an A/B test, then you should consider looking at the big picture instead of focusing only on website elements. For example, instead of getting distressed by individual website elements like copy, images form fields, etc., look for significant issues in the entire conversion path. Or instance, check if recurring problems faced while going through the whole conversion path have been fixed or not - or if something is getting in the way of users and preventing them from converting on your website.

Once you identify where the problems lie, you can use this information to dig deeper and get a more comprehensive and accurate idea about the real cause of the problem (the root cause). Only then will you come up with a natural solution for it. So, before rerunning your tests, make sure that you know all possible reasons - both individual and general issues - why users are not converting on your website.

A/B testing will help you find out how some aspects of your web page affect conversions, whereas user testing will help you understand why these elements are having such an impact on your conversions.

Why Usability Matters

There are five significant reasons why usability should be prioritized while running an optimization process.

1) Higher conversion rates

2) Quicker insights

3) More accurate data, which leads to better decision-making

4) Better ROI ( return on investment ) for your marketing dollars by making sure that the improvements made to the website are practical and not just based on assumptions

5) A higher percentage of repeat visitors - because users will want to come back to your website, which means that they enjoyed their experience there. This can lead to more conversions if you try to make these visitors customers.

So, even though both user testing and A/B testing play a significant role in website optimization, user testing plays a crucial role in finding out the root cause of the problem so that you can come up with real solutions for it.

A/B tests can be used to find out if a change on your web page is effective or not, and then these results should be used to improve conversions by focussing on website elements that are affecting conversions positively. While user testing helps you understand why specific changes might have impacted the overall conversion rate and how adding such changes will help improve conversions.

Conclusion: This concludes this article on when to use A/B testing vs. usability analysis. I hope you found it helpful! If yes, please share it with others who might benefit from reading it too!

Challenges in implementing recommendations from usability testing

Not following recommendations from user-testing can be a significant loss for you because that might mean that the changes suggested by the users would go unheeded, preventing you from meeting your business goals.

Many companies and marketers ignore conversions and website improvements suggested by users who have tested their web pages through usability studies. This is mainly because these people believe in making changes on websites based solely on analytics reports or vanity metrics like bounce rate, average time spent on the site, etc., rather than looking at actual customer behaviour, which gives them insights into why customers are not converting.

This is where A/B testing comes into play. It helps them get statistically sound results about whether the design changes suggested by users were working or not.

So, it is always good to use both A/B testing and usability analysis together. Online marketers understand the importance of user-testing, but they have a tough time implementing the changes suggested by their users because most times, they are unable to justify these changes in terms of metrics - which means that there is no way for them to prove that these changes will help them increase conversions.

However, A/B testing helps them get statistically sound results about whether the design changes suggested by their users were working or not. Therefore, if you use this information (the results from A/B tests) along with what was presented by your users during usability studies, you can easily claim that any change recommended by your users has a higher chance of increasing conversions or leading to better ROI - which in turn would make it much easier for you to convince your management about the value of these suggested changes.

In short, when you use A/B tests and usability analyses together, it becomes straightforward for you to determine the actual impact that the suggested changes might have on your business goals. This will help justify their benefits before people in charge.

Advantages of A/B testing

As already mentioned, A/B tests help you get statistically sound results about whether a design change suggested by your users was working or not. So how do you find out if a predicted business impact will happen? The answer: Use A/B tests!

These tests give you insights into what would happen if you make changes to web pages. In addition, it enables you to draw inferences about the potential outcomes of such modifications, making it easier for management or upper-level management like the CEO or CFO to improve conversions.

A significant advantage of usability testing is that it helps improve website conversion rates through actionable recommendations. Marketers and designers can implement these recommendations immediately, and they should ideally provide better ROI soon. Therefore, it is recommended that you use A/B testing along with usability testing so that you can get statistically sound results about whether the design changes suggested by your users were working or not.

The other advantage of using A/B tests is that it helps prove the ROI for investments like design, development, and even content changes made on web pages. They both save money and time while helping create better user experiences (UX).

So, to sum it up, when your goal is to make informed decisions about converting more visitors into customers through website changes, always remember to follow the "A" in A/B testing!

Combining methods

You can try out some elements (like new designs, features, and even content) on sections of your web pages and see which ones make the most significant impact. This means that you change one or two variables at a time; it becomes easier to determine what might be working better for your users and what isn't. It is a good idea to directly compare the results of the original version with those of new changes for individual elements.

This makes it easier to use both methods, A/B testing and usability testing, together to get the best outcomes. For example, you can A/B test different design variations almost immediately (following some basic rules) while simultaneously conducting qualitative research on your experiments to determine if users are finding them easier or difficult to navigate through your website.

There is no correct method for all kinds of projects, and it depends on what you're trying to achieve from those methods and how much time and resources you can invest in testing and collecting results. To, before hiring a UX research provider like us (I recommend you read our profile here ) or before getting down to testing different web elements, make sure that you have a clear understanding of what exactly needs to be tested and what will happen if your users don't find those changes easy.

In short, you need to understand the difference between both methods to choose the proper method for your project, the right way! If you're looking for a detailed guide on conducting usability studies, feel free to download this guide. Also, let us know if we've missed out on something in this article that could help marketers and designers better understand testing.

Purpose of A/B testing

The purpose of the A/B testing is to find out what works best. The idea behind A/B testing is that effective web pages have their variables tested to determine which elements work best for users and how much difference each piece makes to conversions.

Let's assume that your website has four different design layouts for its homepage. You need to choose the layout which will convert better, right? Could you rather have an "A" or a "B"? ell, there are two possibilities here!

You either go with option A (your existing design) or option B (the new design). If you would like to keep it simple, we're going to call them Option one and Option two, and they both will be tested against each other.

With the help of A/B testing, you will know which design performs better than the other, i.e., which options are more effective for increasing conversions or getting user tasks done.

Advantages of user usability testing

The market is generally excellent with numbers and tests. There are many different methods to A/B test layouts on your website. But, did you know that there is another method too? Usability testing has been around for quite some time, and it's often used together with A/B testing.

Usability testing helps you see how well users can navigate through websites or web applications by collecting data about their reactions (though indirect; think; clicks on "next" button), desires, preferences, etc. it is all about asking what they want rather than telling them what they need! While the usability test's primary objective is not to make decisions like in an A/B test (it's all about observation), it does help design better experiences that increase conversions.

The critical thing to understand here is that there is no point in testing and collecting results if you cannot conduct the tests with users. For example, we all use different software, browsers, and operating systems on our desktops and laptops. If your website doesn't work optimally with those technologies (which most do not), then it will be a problem for participants and testers.

Users don't want to go through such hassle! So before conducting usability tests, make sure that users can see how they're doing rather than what they're doing. This means you need to focus on the user interface, which should be intuitive so that users stick around long enough to complete tasks without getting distracted by other elements on a page or within a web application.

Geolance is an on-demand staffing platform

We're a new kind of staffing platform that simplifies the process for professionals to find work. No more tedious job boards, we've done all the hard work for you.


Geolance is a search engine that combines the power of machine learning with human input to make finding information easier.

© Copyright 2022 Geolance. All rights reserved.